The origins of representative democracy Essay Example for Free

The origins of representative democracy EssayWho benefited from the Magna Carta? The English NobilityThe English nobility gained the most benefits from the Magna Carta, which established limitations on the power of the king.Which of the following was guaranteed in the English Bill of Rights? Freedom from taxation without representation.Whose ideas about government greatly influenced the men who drafted the result of Independence and the Constitution? John Locke The writings of John Locke, a British philosopher of the Enlightenment period, had a profound influence on the Founding Fathers. What was the colonists essential complaint about the rule of the British Crown? The American colonists primary complaint was that they were subject to heavy taxes from the British Crown.Which of the following was a office of the Coercive Acts? Establishment of martial law, the requirement for the colonists to quarter British soldiers, the closure of the embrasure of Boston, and the dissolution of the Massachusetts general assembly were all components of the Coercive Acts.Which event directly resulted from the Coercive Acts? the First Continental Congress directly resulted from the Coercive Acts.Which role of the Declaration of Independence contains arguments on the right to revolution? Arguments on the right to revolution, based on the philosophy of John Locke, are found in the second section of the Declaration of Independence.Who was given the primary responsibility for drafting the Declaration of Independence? Thomas Jefferson was given the primary responsibility for drafting the Declaration of Independence.What were the main ideas verbalized in the Declaration of Independence? The main ideas expressed in the Declaration of Independence were individual rights and liberties and the duty of the government to protect them.The Articles of Confederation specified that the united States would be which form of government? The Articles of Confederation specified that the U nited States would be a re exoteric.What concerned the Founders in drafting the Articles of Confederation? Mob rule, arbitrary monarchic power, large territory size, and the ability of the people to check government power were all organizen into account by the Founders when they drafted the Articles of Confederation.Which of the following was NOT a component of the Articles of Confederation? A bicameral legislature was not a component of the Articles of Confederation (Congress had a single chamber).What led the Founders to realize that the Articles of Confederation needed to be reconfigured? Crises like Shays Rebellion, the inability of the subject area government to control financial concerns and raise taxes, the disproportionate power held by the states, and the vulnerability of the new nation due to the pretermit of an executive all contributed to the movement to reconfigure the Articles of Confederation.As the Constitution was being drafted, who was most in support of equal representation in the national legislature? humiliated states such as Rhode Island most strongly supported equal representation in the legislature.Which of the following externalises for representation was incorporated into the Connecticut agree? The Connecticut via media incorporated a plan calling for each state to be proportionally represented in one house of a bicameral legislature (the House of Representatives).What was Shays Rebellion? Farmers in western Massachusetts, angry that their lands were being foreclosed upon for debts, shut down the solicits and stormed an arsenal.The Constitution was ratified in the year? The Constitution was ratified in 1788.The Bill of Rights was ratified in the year?1791How many terms did George Washington serve as president before leaving office? George Washington served cardinal terms.Marbury v. Madison confirmed the Supreme Courts power to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional. What did the case involve? Marbury v. Madison con cerned a dispute over William Marburys appellation to a government post.Debates at the Constitutional Convention surrounding the executive branch included which of the following? Debates surrounding the executive branch included both(prenominal) how many executives should serve and how to elect the executive.The Constitution differed from the Articles of Confederation in that itThe Constitution differed from the Articles of Confederation in that it gave Congress the power to establish a national court system.What did it take for Virginia and New York to finally agree to ratify the Constitution? New York and Virginia agreed to ratify the Constitution only after the Federalists promised to include amendments clarifying the limits on government power (the Bill of Rights).Chapter 1. The Founding ConstitutionStudy QuestionsKey TermsGreat Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise)The Great Compromise was an agreement do among the delegates to the Constitutional Convention that the America n government would have two houses in Congress the Senate where each state has two Senators, and the House of Representatives where each state has a number of Representatives based on population.The Great Compromise ended one of the most serious disagreements among the new states. Small states felt that all states were equal in stature and that if Congressional representation were based upon population, they would be outvoted on everything. Large states felt that populations should determine how many representatives a state should have, because they were afraid that they would be outvoted by the small states. This disagreement was preventing the Constitution from being adopted. In order to move forward on the Constitution, the states compromised and made Congress as a bicameral legislative body.Without the Great Compromise, there might not be the Constitution or US Government as we know it today.BackgroundTwo plans were put forwards during the Constitutional Convention to create th e new branches of government. The Virginia Plan wanted a strong national government with three branches. The legislature would have two houses. ace would be directly elected by the people and the second would selected by the first house from people nominated by the state legislatures. Further, the president and national judiciary would be chosen by the national legislature. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan wanted a more decentralized plan amending the old Articles yet allowing for a somewhat stronger government. Each state would have one vote in Congress.The Great Compromise combined these two plans creating our watercourse legislature with two houses, one based on population and elected by the people and the other house allowing two senators per state being name by state legislatures. (Direct election of Senators began after the 17th amendment was ratified in 1913.)Bicameralisma legislative body having two branches, houses, or chambers3/5ths CompromiseThree-Fifths Compromi se slaves would not be counted as whole persons for the purposes of representation, but they would not be excluded from the population count both. Instead, a slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person. In this way, large Southern slave states would not be overly advantaged in representation in the lower house of Congress, but they would be accept for their population size. However, besides allowing greater representation for states with large slave populations, the Constitution did not address the institution of slavery in any other way. It would take 80 years and the bloody Civil War for the nation to fully eradicate slavery and recognize African Americans as free persons with rights to citizenship. Even then, it would be another century before African Americans in the South would enjoy equal access to voting and be allowed to serve as members of a jury. time interval of PowersSeparation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into dist inct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another. The intent is to prevent the concentration of power and proffer for checks and balances. The traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of American government are * The legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government. * The executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.* The judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it. Forty state constitutions specify that government be change integrity into three branches legislative, executive and judicial. California illustrates this approach The powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial. Persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise ei ther of the others except as permitted by this Constitution. While separation of powers is key to the workings of American government, no democratic system exists with an infrangible separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers.Governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly com expoundmentalized. As a result, there is an integral measure of competition and conflict among the branches of government. Throughout American history, there also has been an ebb and flow of preeminence among the governmental branches. Such experiences suggest that where power resides is part of an evolutionary process. This Web page provides resources for legislators and staff to use in addressing separation of powers issues. It organizes them into broad categories and links to a diverse set of resources to illustrate how the doctrine applies to special issues under each category. The resources include law review article s, court cases and legislative reports.